<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft vs. Mozilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mephistos.com/2009/05/20/microsoft-vs-mozilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mephistos.com/2009/05/20/microsoft-vs-mozilla/</link>
	<description>A medieval, agrarian, libertarian, green-living, alpha-geek&#039;s view on the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 02:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://mephistos.com/2009/05/20/microsoft-vs-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mephistos.com/?p=1537#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>I have not checked into such, but in today&#039;s world more RAM is uber cheap.  Curious as to version compared though, because at the time of my post, Chrome was so much faster I would have been willing to loose a little more RAM.  Of course, my systems all have plenty if it available and maybe I would change my mind on an older system with limits.  Thanks for the info though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not checked into such, but in today&#8217;s world more RAM is uber cheap.  Curious as to version compared though, because at the time of my post, Chrome was so much faster I would have been willing to loose a little more RAM.  Of course, my systems all have plenty if it available and maybe I would change my mind on an older system with limits.  Thanks for the info though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://mephistos.com/2009/05/20/microsoft-vs-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mephistos.com/?p=1537#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>I did some research with browsers lately, trying to leave as much unused RAM as possible - Chrome uses &lt;b&gt;twice&lt;/b&gt; as much RAM as IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some research with browsers lately, trying to leave as much unused RAM as possible &#8211; Chrome uses <b>twice</b> as much RAM as IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Snape</title>
		<link>http://mephistos.com/2009/05/20/microsoft-vs-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Snape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mephistos.com/?p=1537#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been considering this in the last few days, and I suppose it&#039;s one of those things that the majority of people ought to be focusing on. People can&#039;t expect to get anywhere if we merely keep our heads buried in the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been considering this in the last few days, and I suppose it&#8217;s one of those things that the majority of people ought to be focusing on. People can&#8217;t expect to get anywhere if we merely keep our heads buried in the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: mephistos.com @ 2012-05-22 15:01:43 -->
